Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1986No. 1184S450PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant-appellant, Tony Armstrong, appeals his conviction of murder. He argues the trial court erroneously denied his motion to exclude evidence that was based upon the State's alleged failure to comply with a discovery order. Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction and a new trial.

Defendant was charged with murder after shooting a convenience store clerk during a robbery. The trial court ordered discovery. Defendant alleges the State violated the following portions of the discovery order:

The State shall disclose to the defense the following material and information…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Keller v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bernard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Darby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API