Legal Opinion

Schilstra v. Van Den Heuvel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 14, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Howull, V. C.

The hill in this case is filed for the regulation of the affairs of the Northside'Christian Reformed Church of Passaic, upon the ground that there was a misappropriation of the property and temporalities of the church society, the same having been diverted by a faction of the church from the denomination known as the Christian Reformed Church in America. The bill is filed by five individuals who bring the suit not only on their own behalf, but on behalf of all members of the Northside Christian Reformed Church, who are similarly situated. • It alleges, in short, that there is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Scherff v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rockwell v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Grupe v. RudisillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Kelly v. McIntireNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  4. Protestant Episcopal Church v. GravesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. St. John the Baptist, C., Church v. GengorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API