Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Thomas
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided November 3, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 4622PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIXON, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION.
This marks the premiere federal appearance of this extended and protracted litigation in the Mississippi State Courts arising out of a business relationship between the petitioner, E. E. Morgan, and the intervenor, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereinafter called U.S.F. & G.). In view of the fact that their protracted legal pugilism will hereinafter be discussed in more detail, this Court will briefly state the nature thereof in order to bring the case sub judice into proper perspective. Morgan, an experienced contractor, who had large…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capitol Products Corporation, a Corporation, Judgment Creditor-Appellant v. Frederick E. Hernon, Judgment Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Koehring Co. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- E. E. Morgan v. Fred Thomas, Sheriff of Hinds County, Miss., Etc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- E. E. Morgan v. Fred Thomas, Sheriff of Hinds County, Miss., Etc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971