Legal Opinion

Riley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 13, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals from Cumberland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*34Opinion, op the Court by

Judge Miller

Affirming.

In these three cases, one against Reece Riley, and two against Hunter Riley, the defendants were found guilty of violating the local option law, in Cumberland county. The validity of the several indictments is- the only question upon which reversals are asked.

The indictments are identical in form; they differ only in charging separate offenses. The indictment against Reece Riley, which we will take as a basis in considering the cases, reads as follows:

“The Grand Jury of Cumberland County in the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Board of Education v. Louisville, H. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  4. Adams Express Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. DeBoe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API