Legal Opinion

Huff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1989No. 88-1479PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. We affirm.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the hearsay testimony of an alleged co-conspirator because there was no evidence independent of that testimony to establish defendant’s participation in the alleged conspiracy. We agree that such independent evidence is necessary to justify the admission into evidence of an alleged co-conspirator’s hearsay statements. Verni v. State, 536 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); State v. Edwards, 536 So.2d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988);…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Tsavaris v. NCNB NAT. BANK OF FLA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API