Legal Opinion

Menden v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Upon this appeal defendant contends, (1) that its negligence, if any, was not a cause of the death of plaintiff’s intestate; (2) that assuming it to be an efficient cause, the negligence of deceased was as a matter of law greater than any negligence that could be fastened upon it. The nature of the contention makes it necessary to review the facts.

Defendant maintained a three-phase feeder circuit extending northwesterly and southeasterly along Hickory street, Milwaukee, on the southerly side of a building occupied in part by the Beckwith Manufacturing Company and the Ebner Shoe Company. This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Billington v. Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Christian v. City of New LondonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wilczynski v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wilger v. Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wear v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Heber v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API