Menden v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Upon this appeal defendant contends, (1) that its negligence, if any, was not a cause of the death of plaintiff’s intestate; (2) that assuming it to be an efficient cause, the negligence of deceased was as a matter of law greater than any negligence that could be fastened upon it. The nature of the contention makes it necessary to review the facts.
Defendant maintained a three-phase feeder circuit extending northwesterly and southeasterly along Hickory street, Milwaukee, on the southerly side of a building occupied in part by the Beckwith Manufacturing Company and the Ebner Shoe Company. This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Billington v. Eastern Wisconsin Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Christian v. City of New LondonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Wilczynski v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilger v. Wisconsin Traction, Light, Heat & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Wear v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Heber v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.