Rmb Services, Inc. v. Truhlar
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RUSSEL.
Plaintiffs, RMB Services, Inc., and Sage & Vargo, P.C., appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendants, Robert J. Truhlar and Truhlar & Truhlar, L.L.P. We reverse and remand with directions.
I. Background
RMB and Sage & Vargo are separate entities owned by the same individuals. As pertinent here, RMB provided collection services to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Sage & Vargo provided legal services on behalf of RMB.
In 2001, State Farm terminated plaintiffs’ services and demanded the return of its files. Plaintiffs sought legal advice from Robert…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Compass Insurance Co. v. City of LittletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Martinez v. BadisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Redden v. SCI Colorado Funeral Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Frank "Kit" Hunter v. SCL Health-Front Range, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2022
- Hutchins v. Board of County Commissioners of Larimer County, ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- King v. Southwest Health Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Noe v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.