Legal Opinion
Davis v. Synhorst
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided January 14, 1964No. Civ. 5-1289PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, District Judge.
This matter came on for further hearing pursuant to Order of this Court dated May 3, 1963, Davis v. Synhorst, 217 F. Supp. 492 (S.D.Iowa). In the opinion filed at that time, this Court expressed the view that the constitutional provisions providing for apportionment of the House of Representatives established by the 1904 amendment and the limitation of one senator to a county, established by the 1928 amendment “in combination prevent proportionate representation in both houses of the General Assembly, and that the constitutional provisions, as they now stand, are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sims v. FrinkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. Executive CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Sincock v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- Smith v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Faubus v. KinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Kruidenier v. McCullochSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Mickey Edwards, Member of Congress, Oklahoma v. James Earl Carter, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Davis v. CameronDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.