Legal Opinion
Sumaira Urooj v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 6, 2013No. 09-70628PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MARSHALL; Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
OPINION
MARSHALL, District Judge:
Petitioners Sumaira Urooj (“Urooj”) and her husband, Khalid Mahmood Turk (“Turk”), seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal from a final order of removal. The order terminated their asylum status and held them removable under § 237(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B), for remaining in the United States longer than permitted. The order also held Urooj removable for misrepresenting a material fact, and declared that Urooj had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Almaz Sayoum Abebe Sisay Mengistu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Clinton WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Mohamad Ahsanul Hoque Morsheda Hoque v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Brezilien v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elen Grigoryan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jamien Jensen v. Exc IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Rodriguez-Casillas v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Adam v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Kabine Fofana v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.