Legal Opinion
State v. Porro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 1978PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
158 N.J. Super. 269 (1978)
385 A.2d 1258
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ALFRED A. PORRO, JR., AND THOMAS JONES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 16, 1978.
Decided April 13, 1978.
Before Judges HALPERN, LARNER and KING.
Mr. Bernard L. Segal argued the cause for appellant Alfred A. Porro, Jr., pro hac vice (Mr. Michael A. Querques, attorney).
Mr. James D. Checki, attorney for appellant Thomas Jones, relied on argument of Mr. Bernard L. Segal (Messrs. Checki & Politan, attorneys).
Mr. James Mayer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. CoyleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. FortinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.