Legal Opinion

Miller v. LIBERTY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITY

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1964No. 40473PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Louise M. Miller, formerly Loomis (defendant below), from an adverse judgment in favor of Liberty National Bank and Trust Company (plaintiff below), refusing to allow defendant an attorney fee for the benefit of her attorneys. The parties will be referred to by their trial court designation.

' There is no conflict in the pertinent facts disclosed by the record. On November 30, 1961, plaintiff filed suit against defendant and M. E. Parsons and Grace F. Parsons to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by defendant to her co-defendants Parsons on March 5,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of America v. Independent Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Pierson v. American National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Doyle v. Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co. v. CesarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Swan-Sigler, Inc. v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Sooner Pipe & Supply Corporation v. RehmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Communication Workers of America, Local 6003 v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API