Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Sanitary District of Decatur

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1987No. 4-87-0316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Spitz

The present case was initiated by the plaintiff acting pro se. She filed a one-count complaint alleging damages against five separate defendants. Each of the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the initial complaint and subsequently plaintiff retained counsel. The motions to dismiss were allowed and two defendants were omitted from further proceedings.

Plaintiff subsequently filed her first-amended complaint in the present cause, and this complaint was framed in four separate counts. The first count pertained to the Sanitary District of Decatur (sanitary district). Plaintiff alleged in count…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Horwath v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. W. H. Lyman Construction Co. v. Village of GurneeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Edwards v. HaegerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Starcevich v. City of FarmingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conocophillips Company v. Jeana ParkoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API