Legal Opinion
Carolina Nat'l Bank v. Wilson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 24, 1929No. 12669PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Acting Associate; Justice; J. W. Thurmond.
This action was instituted in the County Court of Rich-land County by the Carolina National'Bank against Cole T. Blease as an indorser of a promissory note for $1,000, executed by W. Harold Wilson September 29, 1924, and payable ninety days after date to the order of said bank for value received.
The defendant set up what he called a conditional indorsement of the note, and offered testimony to prove the same, but, upon objection made by plaintiff’s attorneys, the testimony was excluded upon the ground that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Lagrone v. TimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
- Jackson v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Arthur v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ballenger Corp. v. City of Columbia, SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- C. G. Gunter, Inc. v. HindmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Columbia National Bank v. People's BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Bethea v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Swift & Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.