Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1934No. 2 Div. 44PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The opinion of the Court of Appeals discloses that Blount was the sole representative of the bank, its alter ego, and the decision was properly rested upon the holding of the court in Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 193 Ala. 120, 69 So. 508, L. R. A. 1916C, 767, cited approvingly in First National Bank v. Laughlin et al., 209 Ala. 349, 96 So. 206, 207, where 'áre the following observations: “It is the general rule that notice to an agent is notice to the principal except in matters as to which the agent is personally interested. There also seems to be a limitation upon the exception,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Huntsville Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Lawrence v. Tennessee Valley BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. First Nat. Bank v. LaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tennessee Valley Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API