Legal Opinion
United States v. John Joseph Vaccaro, and Rochelle Bell, Doing Business as Bell Bail Bonds, Real Party in Interest-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1995No. 94-10021, 94-10072PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Senior Circuit Judge:
The question presented on appeal is whether a district court may order forfeiture of a bail bond after finding that defendant violated a “break no laws” condition of release. Defendant and bail bond company contend that a bond cannot be forfeited except for a defendant’s failure to appear. The bond company failed to file a timely notice of appeal, and accordingly, its appeal is dismissed. We conclude that the district court properly forfeited the bond, holding defendant liable. We affirm.
I
John Joseph Vaccaro was convicted of racketeering. United States v. Vaccaro,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- George L. Barry v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bruce Lippo, D/B/A "Walden-Woodfield Service Station," v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United Artists Corp. & L.P.A.A., Marcello Danon v. La Cage Aux Folles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Alaska Limestone Corp. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. KoreckySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- All Star Bonding v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. Dror Sar-AviCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Vincent Gigante, Andrew Gigante, Sureties-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.