Crozat v. Louisiana Coastal, VII, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Dissent
|,ARMSTRONG, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I believe that the right of habitation is subject to the Public Records Doctrine. Absent proper recor-dation, the right of habitation is not effective as against a third party purchaser.
REHEARING AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION GRANTED.
| .PER CURIAM.
Both appellant and appellees filed applications for rehearing and/or clarification. Appellant requests that we clarify our decision concerning the wrongful eviction claim and rule that Ms. Crozat stated a viable claim for wrongful eviction, thereby reversing the lower court’s opinion entirely and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Long v. ChailanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Jackson v. D'AUBINSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Knighten v. RuffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971