Legal Opinion

(PC) Spence v. Kaur

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 15, 2019No. 2:16-cv-01828Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERALD SPENCE, No. 2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 G. KAUR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s 18 retaliation claim against defendant Kaur. Plaintiff’s first motion to compel discovery and for 19 sanctions,1 and defendant’s motion to compel discovery are before the court. As discussed below, 20 the undersigned partially grants the discovery motions, and denies plaintiff’s motion for sanctions 21 and request for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API