Legal Opinion

Henry Gehring Co. v. McCue

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This cause comes into this court on error from the court of common pleas, wherein a demurrer was sustained to the petition. Error is prosecuted on the ground that the court below had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that the allegations stated in the petition do not constitute a cause of action.

The assignment of error as to the question of jurisdiction is based upon those allegations of the petition which have to do with the subject of patent infringement, and, of course, it is well settled that the United States courts are given exclusive jurisdiction in suits for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Plough Works v. StarlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Chemical Society v. Leadscope, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Water Management, Inc. v. StayanchiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Landskroner v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Scooter Store, Inc. v. SpinLife. Com, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API