Legal Opinion
Colodny v. Krause
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 29, 1975No. 51354PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, Judge.
A loan was made on real property in South Carolina. A note and mortgage was executed by the borrower, Concord Developers, Inc., and guaranteed by Lester Colodny, Richard Feldman, Jean Feldman and Rosalyn Colodny. All the guarantors were residents of Georgia. The loan became in default and R. A. Krause, as nominee of the trustees of ATICO Mortgage Investors, brought a foreclosure, confirmation and deficiency action against Concord (principal debtor) and the four guarantors named above, in a South Carolina court. In accordance with the laws of South Carolina, Krause attempted to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Caruthers v. CorbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
- Sharman v. MortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Crosby v. WenzoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Colodny v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Shackelford v. Central Bank of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.