Legal Opinion · Dissent

Threadgill v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1956No. 36804Published

1DissentJackson, Justice

The majority opinion holds that Vest, or his administratrix, is not such a party as acquired title immediately from Mrs. Nobel, and that the cause of action herein does not devolve from Mrs. Nobel, or her estate. I understand the opinion to hold that the cause of action devolves from 76 O.S.1951 § 5, and 23 O.S.1951 § 61. This conclusion is said to be in harmony with the decision reached in Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 252 Wis. 37, 30 N.W.2d 196.

76 O.S.1951 § 5, supra, provides, in substance, that every one is responsible for injuring another, whether wilfully or for want…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API