Earlston Coal Co. v. Huntington Nat. Bank of Columbus
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The Earlston Coal Company subleased to the Himler Coal Company eighty acres of land upon a royalty basis. The Himler Company owned all the stock of the Kermit-War-field Bridge Company. The latter company and a subsidiary of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company owned a railroad bridge wMeh was subject to a mortgage. The Himler Company being in default in the payment of its royalties, the Earlston Company,' on July 25, 1924, gave the sixty-day notice provided in the sublease of its intention to declare a forfeiture. At the expiration of the sixty days the Earlston…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- First Nat. Bank of Aiken v. JL Mott Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Andrews v. OsiusMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Faris v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934