Legal Opinion

Earlston Coal Co. v. Huntington Nat. Bank of Columbus

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1933No. 6170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Earlston Coal Company subleased to the Himler Coal Company eighty acres of land upon a royalty basis. The Himler Company owned all the stock of the Kermit-War-field Bridge Company. The latter company and a subsidiary of the Norfolk & Western Railway Company owned a railroad bridge wMeh was subject to a mortgage. The Himler Company being in default in the payment of its royalties, the Earlston Company,' on July 25, 1924, gave the sixty-day notice provided in the sublease of its intention to declare a forfeiture. At the expiration of the sixty days the Earlston…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. First Nat. Bank of Aiken v. JL Mott Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Andrews v. OsiusMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. Faris v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API