Legal Opinion

In Re Aurelio

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided April 26, 2000No. 19-10509PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID W. HOUSTON, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

On consideration before the court is an objection, filed by Ron Blevins, d/b/a B & S Sales and Service, to the amended schedule of exemptions submitted by the debtors, James F. Aurelio and Camille Aurelio; response to said objection having been filed by the debtors; and the court, having heard and considered same, hereby finds as follows, to-wit:

I

The court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this contested proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C. § 157. This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Ronald and Marjorie Patterson, Debtors. Appeal of Abbotsford State BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Matter of HahnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
  3. Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Dubrock (In Re Dubrock)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1980
  4. In Re Curtis Neal Heape and Billie Jean Heape, Debtors. Curtis Neal Heape and Billie Jean Heape, Debtors-Appellants v. Citadel Bank of IndependenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Walkington v. Production Credit Ass'n (In Re Walkington)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re BankeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  2. Nicole A. ColeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API