Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1998No. 97-2309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm defendant’s convictions. See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 110 S.Ct. 2793, 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990); United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 94 S.Ct. 988, 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Additionally, we reject the state’s contention that the defendant’s aggravated battery judgment of conviction is incorrect. See Dozier v. State, 677 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

However, we remand the cause to the trial court to clarify defendant’s sentence because the court’s oral pronouncements are unclear as to whether it intended to sentence defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Dozier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API