State v. McKinley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from tbe judgment of the district court for Aitkin county, entered pursuant to the order of Stanton, J., affirming a conviction in justice court of the offense of maintaining an unlicensed drinking place.
1Per curiam
Defendant was prosecuted before a justice of the peace on the charge of maintaining an unlicensed drinking place, wherein intoxicating liquors were sold by him as a beverage. Upon conviction, he appealed to the district court, where the judgment of the justice was affirmed. lie then appealed to this court.
We discover nothing in the record requiring discussion or extended mention. The complaint sufficiently charges a violation of section 1550, R. L. 1905. It is not important that the statute does not define “an unlicensed drinking place.” No definition is necessary. The statute sufficiently…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Plymat v. BrushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Larson v. DuklethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MorehartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921