Legal Opinion
Joseph Sadie v. City of Cleveland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 11, 2013No. 12-3142, 12-3143PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff retirees are former City of Cleveland police officers and they sued their former employer, the City of Cleveland, in federal district court. They alleged that the City violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Ohio’s age discrimination statute, Ohio Rev.Code § 4112 et seq., and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when it forced them into retirement pursuant to Cleveland Codified Ordinance § 135.07(a) (2009), which mandates the retirement of all police officers who have reached the age of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Natu Bah v. Attorney General of the State of Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Ryan v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- Agosto v. City of DanburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- CTIA - The Wireless Association v. Kentucky 911 Services BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Caruso v. St. Louis, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.