Sharp Structural, Inc. v. Franklin Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
After a jury verdict in favor of PlaintiffAppellee Sharp Structural, Inc. (“SSI”) against Defendant-Appellant Franklin Manufacturing, Inc. (“Franklin”), in three post-verdict rulings, the district court: (1) denied Franklin’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”); (2) denied Franklin’s Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment; and (3) granted *587SSI’s Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Franklin timely appeals the district court’s post-verdict orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
SSI…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flowers-Carter v. Braun CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021