Legal Opinion

Sharp Structural, Inc. v. Franklin Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2008No. 06-16581PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

After a jury verdict in favor of PlaintiffAppellee Sharp Structural, Inc. (“SSI”) against Defendant-Appellant Franklin Manufacturing, Inc. (“Franklin”), in three post-verdict rulings, the district court: (1) denied Franklin’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”); (2) denied Franklin’s Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment; and (3) granted *587SSI’s Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Franklin timely appeals the district court’s post-verdict orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

I

SSI…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flowers-Carter v. Braun CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API