Legal Opinion

Heitman v. Nathan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1949No. Civ. 16688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The present appeal is from an order denying distribution to Fanny Heitman of the sum of $5,000 bequeathed in the will of Pink L. Nathan who died August 24, 1946. There is no dispute as to the facts and the only question presented is the construction of clause third, paragraph (a) of decedent’s will, reading as follows:

“ (a) To Fanny Heitman, now serving as a maid in my home in Los Angeles, the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00) in the event she shall have been in my employ during the five years following the date of this Will and living 'at the time of my death, making this bequest for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClotfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. In Re Estate of CowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of CatlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Hilton v. Conrad N. Hilton FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Estate of Alpers v. AlpersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Christen v. SchuertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API