Legal Opinion

United States v. Burkley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-6245Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Derrick A. Burk-ley, a federal inmate appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) allowing him to appeal the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because Mr. Burkley has not made a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” required to obtain a COA, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000), we deny a COA and dismiss the appeal.

On August 16,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BurkleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API