Marks v. Hill
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Panola. Tried below before the Hon. George Lane. The facts are carefully given in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
The appellees, who were the 'plaintiffs below, claimed the land in controversy by virtue of a conveyance from the children and sole heirs of Daniel B. Lewis. The appellants claimed the same land under the surviving widow of Daniel B. Lewis, and under an order of the County Court, made in the administration of the estate of said Lewis, setting the headright certificate aside to her.
The facts necessary to the proper understanding of the case are as follows: In 1839 Daniel B. Lewis, with his wife and two children, immigrated to Texas. In the same year, his wife died, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Withers v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Dancy v. StricklingeTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Poor v. BoyceTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Shannon v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rogers v. RewardTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Boone v. HulseyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Branch v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Commander v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Duncan v. VealTexas Supreme Court · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.