Legal Opinion
City of Douglas v. Douglas Canning Company
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided April 24, 1958No. 7715-APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, District Judge.
The City of Douglas, Alaska, the plaintiff herein, is a municipal corporation of the Territory and as such is the owner of a pile-driven dock with certain structures erected thereon and an approach thereto, situated on tidelands within or adjacent to the corporate boundaries of the City. The approach above referred to is from the adjacent uplands to the dock.
A lease was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for a term of 20 years beginning January 1, 1947, with an option to the defendant to renew the lease for an additional 20 year period. The annual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilmington Parking Authority v. RankenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Bovin v. GalitzkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Risser v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Griffin v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Le Feber v. Village of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- RW Power Partners, L.P. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- L'ESPERANCE v. Town of CharlotteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Reston Recreation Center Associates v. Reston Property Investors Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Guam Economic Development Authority v. Black Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Black Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Guam · 1982