Legal Opinion

Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 24, 2014No. 2014-C-1195PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

|, Writ granted in part, otherwise denied.

We granted this writ in part in this workers’ compensation case to address the procedural issue concerning whether the Court of Appeal can modify a judgment in favor of a non-appealing party when the appellate court reverses the trial court’s judgment, which was granted fully in favor of the non-appealing party, and the non-appealing party did not file an answer to the appeal. For the following reasons, we find the Court of Appeal erred as a matter of law in requiring the claimant to file an answer to the appeal for a modification of the judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Hildebrand v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Calumet GP, LLC v. GarrettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Burnett v. Vill. of EstherwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Burnett v. Vill. of EstherwoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Corey Lamartiniere v. Boise CascadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API