Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paek v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 2006Published

1Dissent

Saxe, J.P, dissents in part in a memorandum as follows:

I disagree with the majority’s further reduction of the verdict for future pain and suffering. Plaintiff suffered a devastating traumatic brain injury, resulting in multiple life-altering cognitive impairments. The jury’s award of $9 million for future pain and suffering was appropriate to the particular circumstances, and certainly, the award as reduced by the trial court to $5 million cannot be said to deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances.

The jury in the present case awarded plaintiff $9…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Reed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Flynn v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API