Rayburn v. Bright

Appellants, the plaintiffs below, appeal the trial court’s final judgment and order on a motion for clarification, arguing that the trial court erred when it held that the wrongful-act doctrine did not permit Appellants to recover fees against William Bright and Barrett Bright, two of the five Appellees. Because Appellants failed to timely file a notice of appeal of the final judgment, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The operative pleading, the sécond' amended complaint, alleged seven counts: (I) injunctive relief; (II) declaratory relief; (III) common law way of necessity;…