Legal Opinion

Bill Childs v. Federal Reserve Bank

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1983No. 82-1598PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

At issue in this appeal is the construction and effect of 12 C.F.R. § 210 et seq. (“Regulation J”). We are asked to decide whether the regulation affords immunity to Federal Reserve Banks from liability to the owner of a check that the bank has negligently handled in the collection process. The district court, in dismissing Childs’s complaint of negligence against the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, held that a Federal Reserve Bank is liable only to its sender bank for negligence in collecting a check. We affirm.

The facts underlying this dispute are not contested. Appellant Childs placed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Citizens First National Bank of Tyler v. Cinco Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Edwin C. Covington v. Aubrey Cole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Jaspercounty, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pacific Products, Inc. v. Great Western Plywood, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Manufacturas International, Ltda. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. OkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  3. Lowe v. Viewpoint BankDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  4. Berthot v. Security Pacific BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Advance Dental Care, Inc. v. Suntrust BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API