Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 30, 2005No. 05-04-01543-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice RICHTER.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the trial judge properly granted Michelle K. Howard’s motion to quash or dismiss the information charging her with violating the “no touch” provision of the Dallas City Code regulating sexually oriented businesses and the conduct of their employees. See Dallas, Tex., Code 41A-18.1(a) (2000). After a de novo review of the order granting the motion, see State v. Moff, 154 S.W.3d 599, 601 (Tex.Crim.App.2004), we conclude the trial judge properly granted the motion and affirm the order.

Background

Howard, a dancer at an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Telia D. Casel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API