Legal Opinion

Hughes, Effinger & Co. v. Epling

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 16, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Hustings Court of the city of Radford, pronounced November 23, 1892, in a suit in chancery, wherein appellants were the complainants, and the appellees were the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The only question to be decided in this case is whether or ■ not the deed of trust, validity of which is attacked by the appellants, is fraudulent per se.

The grantor was engaged in the business of a retail merchant, having one store in East Radford, and another in *425West Radford. He conveyed his stock of goods or merchandise at each place, together with all the fixtures in both storehouses, such as show cases, stoves, and safes, and also .a horse and buggy, to Heflin & Dunlap, trustees, to secure the payment óf a debt due by him to G. W. Epling, and also to secure him as indorser upon two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marks v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
  2. Wray v. DavenportSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Addington v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855
  4. McCormick v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  5. Saunders v. Waggoner & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trotter v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. United States v. LankfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1924
  4. Gray v. Atlantic Trust & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. Hagan v. Richmond Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API