Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Medders

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 29, 1980No. 58837Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I would affirm the trial court’s order granting Medders’ motion to suppress.

*683This court has held many times that "any evidence” will support a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress. For reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Jones v. State, 146 Ga. App. 88 (245 SE2d 449) (1978), I believe the "clearly erroneous” test is the proper standard of review. However, even assuming that the "any evidence” rule provides an appropriate standard of review in the case of a denial of a motion to suppress, it is inconceivable that a different standard applies where the grant of a motion to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Hatcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API