Legal Opinion

Braitman v. Minicucci & Grenga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ submissions in opposition to the motion raise triable issues of fact whether defendants are entitled to any part of the retainer fee paid by plaintiff Brown and East Ridge Partners to defendant Minicucci & Grenga. We therefore modify the order and judgment in appeal No. 1 by denying plaintiffs’ motion. In light of our determination, the appeal by defendants from the order in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 55 Liberty Street Associates v. Garrick-Aug Associates Store Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braitman v. Minicucci & GrengaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API