Legal Opinion

New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Cedarbaum

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

Simultaneously with this motion for an order confirming the referee’s report of sale, leave is asked to enter a deficiency judgment against the defendants Rose Cedarbaum and Eva Landesberg. These defendants appear specially solely for the purpose of opposing the latter part of the motion. They do so upon the ground that the plaintiff had not complied with the provisions of section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act* in that (a) the motion is made more than ninety days since the delivery by the referee of the deed to the premises foreclosed, and (b) the notice of motion for leave to enter the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re McGrathNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API