Legal Opinion

Horton v. Gallardo

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1891No. 13963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him by default, and his counsel makes the point here that the summons in the action was not served on him.

The only evidence contained in the record from which the court could have found service of summons upon the defendant is the following affidavit, indorsed on the summons:—

“Office of the sheriff of Los Angeles County.
“ I hereby swear that I received the within summons on the twenty-sixth day of February, A. D. 1890, and personally served the same on the twenty-seventh day of February, A. D. 1890, by delivering a copy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. MacCrellishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Doerfler v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Weil v. BentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Layton v. TrappMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Buonomo v. Sucesión JuncosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1920
  3. Andino v. KnightSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  4. Rivera v. de ArceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  5. Andino v. KnightSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API