Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1936No. 25170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A “safety, appliance,” for a wilful failure or refusal to use which by an employee would debar him of the right to compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for an injury resulting from his failure to use a safety appliance, is not necessarily an appliance physically attached to or physically connected with the machine out of the use of which by the injured employee the injury arises. Any instrumentality provided by the master for use by an employee in the operation of a machine, the use of which in the operation of the machine would reduce the danger or hazard to the employee from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Herman v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Armour & Co. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Pullman Company v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API