Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Union Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 23, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

Appellee sued appellant to recover a solicitor’s fee for the foreclosure of a mortgage and upon a trial before the court without a jury recovered a judgment for $2,510, the $10 being for costs advanced in the Supreme Court in the foreclosure suit.

The record shows that Judge Keefe represented appellant in its foreclosure suit against John C. Hall et al., which was before this court in 202 Ill. App. 578. The case was reversed for want of necessary parties, and because the court allowed a solicitor’s fee of $3,000 when the solicitor was a director of appellant corporation, and no resolution of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elmore v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lecatt v. SalleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1836
  3. Miller v. LloyddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Scott v. New York Filling Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  5. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Salle National Bank v. 53rd-Ellis Currency Exchange, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API