Legal Opinion
Destination Maternity Corp. v. Target Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-5680PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Destination Maternity Corporation (“DMC”) brings suit against Defendants Target Corporation (“Target”) and Elizabeth Lange, LLC for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,531 (the “'531 Patent”) and RE43,563 (the “'563 Patent”).1 Target moves to stay the litigation pending inter partes review by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). For the reasons set forth below, I will grant Target’s motion to stay the litigation.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 4, 2012, DMC filed suit against Defendants for allegedly infringing the '531 Patent and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Cost Brothers, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. v. Cornell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ever Win International Corp. v. Radioshack Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
3Cited by17 opinions
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Hilti, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- NST Global, LLC, d/b/a SB Tactical v. SIG Sauer Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2019
- DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-19292District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.