Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Lowell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was a bill in equity, and came before, the Court on bill, answers, and proof. The substance is given in the opinion of the Court. This case was argued, it is said, at the May Term, 1841, when the present Reporter was not in office ; and was again argued at the May Term, 1842, Allen, cited Buck v. Pike, 2 Fairf. 9; Conner v. Lewis, 16 Maine R. 275; Gardiner Bank v. Wheaton, 8 Greenl. 373; Powell v. Mon. fy Br. Man. Co. 3 Mason, 347; Jewett v. Palmer, 7 Johns.

Read the full summary

This was a bill in equity, and came before, the Court on bill, answers, and proof. The substance is given in the opinion of the Court. This case was argued, it is said, at the May Term, 1841, when the present Reporter was not in office ; and was again argued at the May Term, 1842, Allen, cited Buck v. Pike, 2 Fairf. 9; Conner v. Lewis, 16 Maine R. 275; Gardiner Bank v. Wheaton, 8 Greenl. 373; Powell v. Mon. fy Br. Man. Co. 3 Mason, 347; Jewett v. Palmer, 7 Johns. C. R. 65. Rand contended, that the answers explicitly denied every material allegation in the bill, and that there was no…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court, on June 3, 1843, was delivered by

Whitman C. J.

— The bill sets forth, that, in 1835 and 1836, the defendant, Lowell, resided in Bangor; and did an *252extensive business there as a dealer in merchandize ; and, in the time, became indebted to the plaintiffs to a large amount; that in October, 1839, they obtained judgment against him, on account thereof, for $3965 debt, and $9,54, costs of suit; on which execution was issued, and returned unsatisfied, there being no visible property of said Lowell whereon to levy it; that said Lowell ceased to do business, as a trader, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hadden v. SpaderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. FigginsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rappleye v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. George v. St. Louis Cable & W. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890
  4. Chapman v. LeavertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Cooley v. LovewellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API