Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Borough of Bradley Beach
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 5, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.
The prosecutor of the writ is a veteran of the world war and holds a license from the county clerk of Mercer county to peddle merchandise in this state in accordance with the provisions of chapter 141 of the laws of 1904 (Pamph. L., p. 273), as amended by chapter 321 of the laws of 1931 (Pamph. L., p. 706), and chapter 119 of the laws of 1934 (Pamph. L., p. 319). He was peddling in Bradley Beach, was arrested and convicted and fined the sum of $5, the sentence being suspended.
The borough has an ordinance prohibiting all peddling and therefore no licenses are issued, and it was under this…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Tagmire v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Franco v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Germano v. KeenanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.