Legal Opinion

In the Interest of J.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1990No. Nos: 89-750, 89-752 and 89-753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

2Per curiam

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to conduct plea colloquies for each of the appellants after they entered pleas of nolo contendere based on the court’s denial of their motion to suppress. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975); J.N. v. State, 483 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Murphy v. State, 464 So.2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); A.E.K. v. State, 432 So.2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

The State also concedes error in the trial court’s order of restitution because the…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. A.E.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. T.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. W.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. E.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API