Legal Opinion

People v. Winpigler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 6, 1999No. 99SA272PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

The People bring this interlocutory appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, seeking reversal of the trial court's order suppressing all evidence obtained following the warrantless entry of the police into the defendant's residence. The defendant moved for suppression of the evidence on the grounds that the police entry into his house violated his constitutional rights,. The trial court agreed, holding that although the police may have possessed probable cause to believe a crime was being committed in the defendant's residence, they lacked sufficient exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. HebertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. HagosColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Joshua M. AARNESSSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API