Mosser v. Donaldson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to tbe Common Pleas of Dauphin County to review a judgment of compulsory nonsuit in an action of assumpsit. In addition to tbe facts appearing in tbe opinions, it may be stated tbat Null, tbe builder, in accordance witb tbe terms of tbe contract set out in tbe opinions, on March 15, 1885, insured tbe building in bis own name in tbe sum of $4,000, against loss from any fire wbicb might occur before March 15 then next ensuing.
Read the full summary
Error to tbe Common Pleas of Dauphin County to review a judgment of compulsory nonsuit in an action of assumpsit. In addition to tbe facts appearing in tbe opinions, it may be stated tbat Null, tbe builder, in accordance witb tbe terms of tbe contract set out in tbe opinions, on March 15, 1885, insured tbe building in bis own name in tbe sum of $4,000, against loss from any fire wbicb might occur before March 15 then next ensuing. A fire did occur on February 16, 1886, resulting in a total loss; and soon afterwards Null assigned tbe policy to Donaldson, tbe owner of tbe building. Shortly…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiaii:
We concur in the opinion of the court below; hence, affirm this case.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hagan v. Scottish Union & National Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1899
- Merino v. Globe Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926
- In re H. A. Moore Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Merino v. Globe Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926