Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fontenot v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1995No. 94-CA-1660Published

1Dissent

| iPLOTKIN, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion wrongly relies on Herb’s Welding, Inc. v. Gray, 470 U.S. 414, 105 S.Ct. 1421, 84 *762L.Ed.2d 406 (1985), for the conclusion that the work-over agreement at issue in this case is subject to the Louisiana Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act, La.R.S. 9:2780 (“LOAIA”). In that case, the United States Supreme Court confronted an oilfield worker’s claim that he was entitled to benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. Gray, an employee of Herb’s Welding, was working as a welder…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Harvey Corbitt v. Diamond M. Drilling Co., Shell Oil Company, Third-Party v. Sladco, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Rodrigue v. LeGrosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Lewis v. Diamond Services Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API