Gelpcke v. Quentell

By the Court,

Davis, P. J.

When this case was here before, the only question presented arose upon the construction to be given to the following clauses of defendant’s letter of 24th December, 1859 : “This credit is intended for advances on consignments of merchandise to my address, and yon will please keep the same in force for the coming year 1860. It is not, however, required, *618that bills of lading accompany the advice of the drafts.” The court held that the latter of these clauses operated to dispense with the necessity of the bills of lading accompanying the drafts, and thereby relieved the…